Description
Li-Fraumeni syndrome is an autosomal dominant cancer predisposition syndrome characterized by a wide range of malignancies that appear at an unusually early age and is generally associated with defects in the tumor protein p53 gene (TP53) (Evans, 2021; Mai et al., 2016; Malkin, 2011).

Regulatory Status
No U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-cleared molecular diagnostic tests were found. Thus, molecular evaluation is offered as a laboratory-developed test. Clinical laboratories may develop and validate tests in-house (“home-brew”) and market them as a laboratory service; such tests must meet the general regulatory standards of the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Act (CLIA). The laboratory offering the service must be licensed by CLIA for high-complexity testing.

Policy 

1. In an individual who has received genetic counseling, comprehensive genetic testing for TP53 mutations is considered MEDICALLY NECESSARY to confirm a diagnosis of Li-Fraumeni syndrome (LFS) under the following conditions:
   1. In a patient who meets either the classic or the Chompret clinical diagnostic criteria for LFS
      1. Classic LFS is defined by the presence of ALL OF the following criteria:
         1. An individual with a sarcoma before 45 years of age
         2. A first-degree relative with any cancer before 45 years of age
         3. An additional first- or second-degree relative with any cancer before 45 years of age, or a sarcoma at any age
      2. Chompret clinical diagnostic criteria is defined by one of the following:
         1. Individual with a tumor belonging to the LFS tumor spectrum (e.g., soft tissue sarcoma, osteosarcoma, central nervous system (CNS) tumor, breast cancer, adrenocortical carcinoma) before age 46 years AND at least one first- or second-degree relative with a LFS tumor (except breast cancer if proband has breast cancer) before 56 years of age or with multiple tumors at any age; OR
         2. Individual with multiple tumors (except multiple breast tumors), two of which belong to the LFS tumor spectrum described above, with the first tumor having occurred before 46 years of age; OR
         3. Individual with adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC), or choroid plexus tumor or rhabdomyosarcoma of embryonal anaplastic subtype, at any age, irrespective of family history; OR
         4. Individual diagnosed with breast cancer before 31 years of age.
2. Genetic testing for the familial TP53 mutation is considered MEDICALLY NECESSARY in a first, second, or third degree relative (who has received genetic counseling) of an individual with a known TP53 mutation (see Policy Guideline #1). 
3. Comprehensive genetic testing is considered MEDICALLY NECESSARY in a first, second, or third degree relative (who has received genetic counseling) of an individual diagnosed with a TP53 mutation when the specific TP53 mutation is unknown (see Policy Guideline #1).  

The following does not meet coverage criteria due to a lack of available published scientific literature confirming that the test(s) is/are required and beneficial for the diagnosis and treatment of a patient’s illness.

1. Genetic testing for a germline TP53 mutation is investigational and/or unproven and therefore considered NOT MEDICALLY NECESSARY. for all other indications.

Policy Guideline #1: 
At the present time, there are no specific, evidence-based, standardized guidelines for recommendations of which “at risk” relatives should be tested. In relatives of an index case, the risk of having a pathologic mutation, and developing disease, is influenced by numerous factors that should be considered in evaluating risk:

1. Proximity of relation to index case (first-, second-, or third-degree)
2. Mode of inheritance of mutation (autosomal dominant versus autosomal recessive)
3. Degree of penetrance of mutation (high, intermediate or low)
4. Results of detailed pedigree analysis
5. De novo mutation rate

If a proband has a TP53 mutation, the risk to the proband’s offspring of inheriting the mutation is 50 percent. If a proband has a TP53 mutation, the risk to other relatives may depend on the genetic status of the proband’s parents (that is, it is not a de novo mutation in the proband). Most TP53 mutations are inherited from 1 of a proband’s parents. After a mutation has been identified in a proband, the proband’s parent with any pertinent cancer history of family history should be tested first to establish the lineage of the mutation; otherwise, both parents should be tested. A family history could appear to be negative because of incomplete penetrance of the mutation, limited family members available for testing, early death of a parent, etc.

Table of Terminology

Rationale
Li-Fraumeni syndrome (LFS) is a rare cancer predisposition syndrome associated with a germline mutation in the tumor suppressor gene TP53 (tumor protein p53) on chromosome 17p13.1 (Correa, 2016). This genetic mutation has an autosomal dominant pattern of inheritance with high penetrance. TP53 encodes for a ubiquitous transcription factor that is responsible for a complex set of critical regulatory functions that promote DNA repair and tumor suppression during episodes of cellular stress and DNA damage (Sorrell et al., 2013). Most TP53 mutations are clustered in the DNA-binding domain within specific codons, such as 175 and 248 (Villani et al., 2016). TP53 mutations are often missense alterations (Petitjean et al., 2007) that cause a change in one nucleotide and encode for a different amino acid than the one typically found in that particular location within the protein. Missense mutations are usually transcriptionally inactive leading to downstream events permissive for development of various malignancies throughout life; however, some reports have shown gain of function oncogenic effects in TP53 (Brosh & Rotter, 2009; Sigal & Rotter, 2000). 

LFS is characterized clinically by the development of cancers arising in multiple organ systems, often at a young age (Birch et al., 1998; Birch et al., 1994; Garber et al., 1991; Li et al., 1988; Mai et al., 2012; Malkin et al., 1990; Olivier et al., 2010; Ruijs et al., 2010).  These patients have a very high lifetime cumulative risk of developing malignancies and early-onset malignancies; around 50% of the individuals carrying mutations in TP53 will develop cancer by the age of 30 years (Hwang et al., 2003; Lustbader et al., 1992; Schneider et al., 2013b), with a lifetime risk of up to 70% in men and almost 100% in women (Chompret et al., 2000). While many tumor types can be seen in patients with LFS, four cancers (breast, sarcoma, brain, and adrenocortical carcinoma) comprise about 80% of LFS associated tumors (Gonzalez et al., 2009; Li et al., 1988; Lynch et al., 1978; Olivier et al., 2003).

Breast Cancer accounts for about 30% of all LFS-associated tumors (Gonzalez et al., 2009; Olivier et al., 2003). Women with LFS-associated  breast cancer tend to present at an earlier age (in the 20s or early 30s) with more advanced stage disease at the time of initial diagnosis (NCCN, 2022a). The ability to distinguish between a germline TP53 mutation (LFS) and a somatic TP53 pathogenic variant (TP53 mosaicism or clonal hematopoiesis) is very important for breast cancer patients and relatives and may help to determine the best method of treatment; “For PV [pathogenic variant] carriers in high-penetrance genes like BRCA1, BRCA2, and TP53, prophylactic mastectomy is often recommended and radiation therapy avoided when possible (Batalini et al., 2019).”

Sarcomas account for about 30% of all LFS-associated tumors (Gonzalez et al., 2009; Ognjanovic et al., 2012; Olivier et al., 2003; Palmero et al., 2010).  Multiple types of soft tissue sarcomas and osteosarcoma are associated with LFS; but Ewing’s sarcoma, gastrointestinal stromal cell tumors (GIST), desmoid tumors, and angiosarcomas have not been reported in LFS patients (NCCN, 2022a, 2022b; Olivier et al., 2003).  

Brain Tumors occur in approximately 14% of individuals with TP53 mutations (Gonzalez et al., 2009; Olivier et al., 2003; Palmero et al., 2010; Ruijs et al., 2010). Glioblastomas/astrocytomas are the most common, but medulloblastoma, ependymoma, supratentorial primitive neuroectodermal tumors, and choroid plexus tumors may also be seen (Farrell & Plotkin, 2007; Ruijs et al., 2010).

Adrenocortical Carcinoma (ACC) accounts for about 7% of cancers in TP53 mutation carriers overall (Gonzalez et al., 2009; Palmero et al., 2010). While ACC has been diagnosed in individuals with LFS at a wide range of ages, it is considered a hallmark of LFS when diagnosed in childhood (Gonzalez et al., 2009; Herrmann et al., 2012; Palmero et al., 2010).

Other LFS Cancers
Beyond the four core LFS cancers, the next most frequently associated cancers include leukemia, lung, colorectal, skin, gastric, and ovarian (Gonzalez et al., 2009; Masciari et al., 2011; Olivier et al., 2003; Palmero et al., 2010; Walsh et al., 2011; Wong et al., 2006). All cancer types are diagnosed at younger than average ages. 

Over the years, several types of classifying systems have been developed for LFS diagnostic purposes (shown below in table 1). The classic LFS phenotype was clinically defined before the identification of germline mutations in TP53; these criteria are the most stringent and are the ones used to make a clinical diagnosis of LFS (with or without the identification of a deleterious germline TP53 mutation) (Li et al., 1988). Further studies revealed that, although highly specific for TP53 germline mutations, these criteria fail to include many mutation-positive families. Broader criteria were developed by Birch and Eeles to identify families which are Li-Fraumeni-like (LFL) (Birch et al., 1994; Eeles, 1995). The most robust analysis of TP53 mutation carriers to date was performed in France by Bougeard et al. (2008); these analyses helped to develop the most recent version of the Chompret criteria which can better identify families with milder phenotypes (Bougeard et al., 2001; Bougeard, Renaux-Petel, Flaman, Charbonnier, Fermey, Belotti, Gauthier-Villars, Stoppa-Lyonnet, Consolino, Brugières, et al., 2015; Chompret et al., 2001; Gonzalez et al., 2009). The Chompret criteria for clinical diagnoses of LFS was shown to provide the highest positive predictive value and, when combined with the classic LFS criteria, provided the highest sensitivity for identifying individuals with LFS (Bougeard, Renaux-Petel, Flaman, Charbonnier, Fermey, Belotti, Gauthier-Villars, Stoppa-Lyonnet, Consolino, Brugieres, et al., 2015; Bougeard et al., 2008; Tinat et al., 2009).

Table 1: Types of LFS classifying systems

ACC: adrenocortical carcinoma; BC: breast cancer; CNS: central nervous system; LFS: Li-Fraumeni syndrome; LFL: Li-Fraumeni-like syndrome.

As noted above, the TP53 gene has an autosomal dominant pattern of inheritance (Evans, 2021). Mutations such as this can be studied with a pedigree, which is essentially a genetic based family tree. Pedigrees begin with the “proband,” which is the subject being studied or tested. If one of the proband’s parents carries the TP53 mutation, each sibling has a 50% risk of having the mutation. If neither parent is found to carry the mutation, the risk to siblings is low, but they should be tested due to the possibility of germline mosaicism. Offspring of a proband have a 50% risk of carrying the mutation. Phenotypes of families carrying TP53 mutations can be highly variable (Malkin, 2011; McBride et al., 2014). 

Additionally, mutations in TP53 can lead to different consequences on gene function. A locus is a fixed position on a chromosome where a gene is located. The possibility of a second locus involved in LFS is an additional issue in the etiology of the syndrome since approximately 20 % of LFS and up to 80 % of LFL families do not exhibit TP53 mutations (Malkin, 2011; McBride et al., 2014). However, no association was found with p53 partners in tumor suppressor pathways, including BAX (BCL2 Associated X) (Barlow et al., 2004), CDKN2A (Cyclin Dependent Kinase Inhibitor 2A) (Portwine et al., 2000), TP63 (tumor protein p63) (Bougeard et al., 2001), CHEK2 (Checkpoint kinase 2) (Bougeard et al., 2001), BCL10 (BCL10 Immune Signaling Adaptor) (Stone et al., 1999), or PTEN (Phosphatase and tensin homolog) (Brown et al., 2000) in TP53-negative families. Although a few studies have linked other loci to LFS (Aury-Landas et al., 2013; Bachinski et al., 2005), TP53 remains the only gene conclusively associated to the syndrome (Evans, 2021).

Large panels or single gene tests can be used to identify a TP53 pathogenic variant. For example, Invitae has developed a test which analyzes only the TP53 gene with a  3 mL whole blood sample; this test has a turnaround time of 10-21 days (Invitae, 2020). Blueprint Genetics has developed a similar one gene panel test which also analyzes the TP53 gene in 3-4 weeks (BluePrint, 2020). 

It is common to find TP53 mutations during tumor profiling, but germline mutations are very rare. Germline testing is not recommended if somatic mutations in TP53 are found unless there is a defined personal or family history indicative of Li-Fraumeni syndrome (Peshkin, 2022). 

Clinical Utility and Validity
The reported percentage of LFS due to TP53 mutation varies between studies and criteria used. According to Schneider et al. (2013b), approximately 80 percent of individuals with features of LFS will have an identifiable TP53 mutation. Families that have clinical features of LFS without TP53 mutation are more likely to have a different hereditary cancer syndrome (Schneider et al., 2013a). Some studies have reported that approximately 70% to 80% of families meeting the classic LFS criteria have the TP53 mutation (Nagy et al., 2004; Varley, 2003). However, Gonzalez et al. (2009) reported that a slightly lower positive predictive value for the p53 mutation rate using the classic criteria among 341 patients (56%), with high specificity of 91% but low sensitivity (40%). Chompret et al. (2001) reported TP53 mutations can be found in 20% of cases using the Chompret criteria. Gonzalez et al (2009) reported a higher positive predictive value for LFL syndrome using Chompret criteria (35%) than Birch (16%) or Eeles (14%) (Gonzalez et al., 2009).

Gonzalez et al. (2009) used a clinical testing cohort to understand the spectrum of tumors associated with germline p53 mutations. Mutations were identified in 17% (91 of 525) of patients submitted for testing. All families with a p53 mutation had at least one family member with a sarcoma, breast, brain, or adrenocortical carcinoma. Overall, 75 patients with a p53 mutation had an adequate family history, and out of these 75, 71 fulfilled the classic LFS or Chompret criteria. When the classic LFS and Chompret criteria were used together, the testing sensitivity was 95%, and the specificity was 52% (Gonzalez et al., 2009).

Villani et al. (2011) assessed the feasibility and clinical impact of a comprehensive surveillance protocol in asymptomatic TP53 mutation carriers in eight families with LFS. A total of 33 TP53 mutation carriers were identified, 18 of whom underwent surveillance. In the surveillance group, 10 tumors developed in 7 patients, and all 7 patients were alive after a median follow-up of 24 months. In the non-surveillance group, 12 tumors developed in 10 patients, and only 2 were alive after 24 months. The authors reported a 3-year overall survival of 100% in the surveillance group compared to 21% in the non-surveillance group (Villani et al., 2011).

Bougeard, Renaux-Petel, Flaman, Charbonnier, Fermey, Belotti, Gauthier-Villars, Stoppa-Lyonnet, Consolino, Brugieres, et al. (2015) evaluated the genetic spectrum of LFS. The authors identified 415 TP53 mutation carriers with 133 different TP53 mutations. A total of 322 of these carriers were affected and eventually developed 552 tumors. In childhood, the LFS tumor spectrum was as follows: “osteosarcomas, adrenocortical carcinomas, central nervous system (CNS) tumors, and soft tissue sarcomas (STS) observed in 30%, 27%, 26%, and 23% of the patients, respectively.” Adults presented with breast carcinomas in 79% of females and with soft tissue sarcomas in 27% of overall patients. Age of onset varied according to type of mutation; carriers with dominant-negative missense mutations had a mean onset of 21.3 years, carriers with loss of function mutations had a mean onset of 28.5 years, and carriers with genomic rearrangements had a mean onset of 35.8 years. The authors suggested that stratifying clinical management of LFS by class of mutation may be useful (Bougeard, Renaux-Petel, Flaman, Charbonnier, Fermey, Belotti, Gauthier-Villars, Stoppa-Lyonnet, Consolino, Brugieres, et al., 2015).

In 2016, Villani et al. (2016) updated their assessment of a prospective observational study and modified the surveillance protocol. Out of the 89 carriers of TP53 pathogenic variants in 39 unrelated families, 40 (45%) agreed to surveillance and 49 (55%) declined surveillance. The authors reported a 5-year overall survival was 88.8% in the surveillance group and 59.6% in the non-surveillance group (Villani et al., 2016).

Rana et al. (2018) compared the histories of patients whose TP53 mutations (TP53+) were identified by panel testing to those whose mutations were identified by single-gene testing. A total of 126 TP53+ patients were identified with panel testing, and 96 were identified with single-gene testing. The patients who were identified with panel testing were older at “first cancer identification” and at cancer diagnosis. Established LFS testing criteria were met less often in patients in the panel testing cohort, and phenotypes of the panel testing cohort were often different from those in the single-gene cohort (Rana et al., 2018).

Bakhuizen et al. (2019) completed a nation-wide analysis in the Netherlands which measured TP53 germline mutations in early-onset breast cancer cases. This study included data from 370 women diagnosed with breast cancer between 2005 and 2016 who were younger than 30 years at the time of diagnosis. All women included in the study were tested for TP53 genetic mutations. A total of eight of these women were found to carry a likely pathogenic TP53 sequence (< 1%), showing the rarity of a TP53 mutation in breast cancer cases. However, the researchers note that TP53 mutation prevalence was similar or greater in other studies which included patients with an older age of onset, questioning whether an early age of onset is necessary as a TP53 genetic testing criterion (Bakhuizen et al., 2019).

Lincoln et al. (2020) studied the yield and utility of germline genetic testing following tumor DNA sequencing in patients with cancer. Germline testing was performed on 2023 patients and the prevalence of pathogenic germline variants (PGVs) was calculated. PGVs were found in 617 of the 2023 patients associated with cancers of the breast, colorectal, renal, lung, and bladder. About 82% of the patients identified with a PGV met the criteria for follow-up testing and 8.1% of PGVs were missed by tumor sequencing. Only 4% of pathogenic TP53 variants were germline, but 64% of the germline TP53 carriers did not meet the Chompret criteria for germline TP53 testing. It was found that genes which frequently acquire somatic mutations were a challenge because clinicians assumed TP53 to be somatic, so TP53 variants identified by tumor germline sequencing were underreported. The authors conclude that although the yield of germline findings of the TP53 gene is relatively low, the clinical impact can be substantial. Therefore, they recommend broader germline testing for these genes despite the low yield (Lincoln et al., 2020).

Terradas et al. (2021) studied TP53 variants that were detected in colorectal cancer patients without a LFS phenotype. 473 patients with colorectal cancer were assessed for TP53 pathogenic variants. Pathogenic variants were identified in 0.05% of the control and 0.26% of the colorectal cancer patients, none of whom fulfilled the clinical criteria for TP53 testing. The authors conclude that "TP53 pathogenic variants should not be unequivocally associated with LFS. Prospective follow-up of carriers of germline TP53 pathogenic variants in the absence of LFS phenotypes will define how surveillance and clinical management of these individuals should be performed (Terradas et al., 2021)."

Yamamoto et al. (2020) performed an analysis of 194 patients with advanced cancer who had undergone next-generation sequencing (NGS) performed only on tumor specimens. The goal was to identify variants that had the potential to be secondary findings. Out of 194 patients, 120 were identified with possible secondary findings. The gene with the highest incidence was TP53, with a total of 97 variants identified among 91 patients. Of these patients, nine had additional germline testing performed, with 14 variant genes involved (BRCA1, n = 1; BRCA2, n = 2; PTEN, n = 2; RB1, n = 1; SMAD4, n = 1; STK11, n = 1; TP53, n = 6). Those persons identified with TP53 variants were confirmed as somatic variants, as opposed to germline. The authors concluded, “We analyzed 24 patients with TP53 variants who underwent a paired tumor–normal NGS assay. As expected, all TP53 variants were confirmed to be somatic variants. A total of 30 patients were tested for germline variants in TP53, but none of them resulted in true SFs, suggesting the low prevalence of SFs in this gene.”

National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN)
The NCCN maintains guidelines for the diagnosis and management of Li-Fraumeni Syndrome (NCCN, 2022a)
NCCN recommends testing for Li-Fraumeni Syndrome in the following situations:

• Individual from a family with a known TP53 pathogenic/likely pathogenic variant
• Classic Li-Fraumeni syndrome criteria
• Chompret criteria
• Affected individual with pathogenic/likely pathogenic variant identified on tumor genomic testing that may have implications if also identified on germline testing

The classic Li-Fraumeni syndrome criteria are as follows: 

• “Combination of an individual diagnosed age < 45 y with a sarcoma AND
• A first-degree relative diagnosed age < 45 y with cancer AND
• An additional first- or second-degree relative in the same lineage with cancer diagnosed < 45 y, or a sarcoma at any age (NCCN, 2022a)”

The Chompret criteria are as follows: 

• “Individual with a tumor from LFS tumor spectrum (eg, soft tissue sarcoma, osteosarcoma, CNS tumor, breast cancer, adrenocortical carcinoma [ACC]) before 46 y of age, AND at least one first- or second-degree relative with any of the aforementioned cancers (other than breast cancer if the proband has breast cancer) before the age of 56 y or with multiple primaries at any age OR
• Individual with multiple tumors (except multiple breast tumors), two of which belong to LFS tumor spectrum with the initial cancer occurring before the age of 46 y OR 
• Individual with adrenocortical carcinoma, or choroid plexus carcinoma or rhabdomyosarcoma of embryonal anaplastic subtype, at any age of onset, regardless of family history OR
• Breast cancer before age 31 years (NCCN, 2022a)”

If these criteria are fulfilled, the TP53 gene may be tested. If the familial pathogenic variant of TP53 is known, that variant may be tested for. If it is unknown, a comprehensive TP53 test may be done. 

Reproductive options:

• For patients of reproductive age, advise about options for prenatal diagnosis and assisted reproduction including pre-implantation genetic diagnosis. Discussion should include known risks, limitations, and benefits of these technologies (NCCN, 2022a, 2022b).”

For relatives:

• “Advise about possible inherited cancer risk to relatives, options for risk assessment, and management.
• Recommend genetic counseling and consideration of genetic testing for at-risk relatives (NCCN, 2022a, 2022b).”

Children:

• “Genetic testing is generally not recommended when results would not impact medical management (NCCN, 2022b).”

American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) 
The ACMG has noted TP53 as a gene whose secondary findings should be reported if found (Kalia et al., 2017). In 2021, a joint ACMG/AMP variant interpretation guideline was published for germline TP53 variants; the authors note that “intense” cancer surveillance for those patients with TP53 germline pathogenic variants can lead to “reduced cancer-related mortality (Fortuno et al., 2021).”

Li-Fraumeni Syndrome Association (LFSA) 
The LFSA notes certain criteria that can be used to determine if genetic testing should be performed. The classic LFS criteria, Chrompret criteria, Birch definition of Li-Fraumeni-like syndrome, and Eeles definition of Li-Fraumeni-syndrome may all be fulfilled to consider genetic testing (LFSA, 2021).

National Organization of Rare Diseases (NORD) 
The NORD states that “Li-Fraumeni syndrome is diagnosed based on the presence of a so called pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant in the TP53 gene.”; further, “The potential of genetic testing (and the implications of the results) should always involve discussions with a genetic counselor, medical providers, and family (NORD, 2021).” The NORD also notes that genetic testing can be considered based on classic LFS criteria, Chrompret criteria, the Birch definition of Li-Fraumeni-like syndrome, and the Eeles definition of Li-Fraumeni-syndrome.

American Society of Breast Surgeons (ASBrS) 
The ASBrS have published consensus guidelines on genetic testing for hereditary breast cancer. These guidelines state that “Increased access to testing would likely lead to more patients pursuing testing and improving rates of identification of gene carriers. Breast surgeons are well positioned to be a resource for patients who may benefit from testing. Breast surgeons can identify individuals who are suitable for testing, inform patients of the risks and benefits, provide access to genetic testing, and also discuss risk management strategies for those patients who test positive. For patients with less common mutations, strong consideration should be given to consultation with cancer genetics specialists. Hereditary mutations to be considered include BRCA 1&2, PALB2, and other hereditary breast cancer syndromes, which include but are not limited to Li-Fraumeni syndrome (TP53 pathogenic variant), Cowden syndrome (PTEN pathogenic variant), hereditary diffuse gastric cancer syndrome (CDH1 pathogenic variant), and Peutz-Jeghers syndrome (STK11 pathogenic variant)” (Manahan et al., 2019).

European Reference Network GENTURIS 
ERN provides recommendations on cancer patients who should be tested for TP53 germline mutations. They recommend testing the following patients:

• “Patients who meet the Chompret Criteria. These include those with familial presentation, multiple primitive tumors, rare tumors such as adrenocortical carcinoma, choroid plexus carcinoma, or rhabdomyosarcoma, or very early-onset breast cancer (Breast cancer before 31 years, irrespective of family history)
• Patients who are children or adolescents presenting with hypodiploid acute lymphoblastic leukemia, unexplained sonic hedgehog-driven medulloblastoma, or Jaw osteosarcoma. 
• Patients who develop a second primary tumour, within the radiotherapy field of a first core TP53 tumour which occurred before 46 years, should be tested for germline TP53 variants
• Children with any cancer from southern and south-eastern Brazilian families should be tested for the p.R337H Brazilian founder germline TP53 variant.”

ERN does not recommend testing “patients older than 46 years presenting with breast cancer without personal or familial history fulfilling the ‘Chompret Criteria.’” If a patient with isolated breast cancer does not fulfill the Chompret Criteria but has a TP53 variant, the patient should be referred to an expert multidisciplinary team for discussion.

ERN also provides testing recommendations for pre-symptomatic individuals. They recommend that: 

• “Adult first-degree relatives of individuals with germline disease causing TP53 variants should be offered testing for the same germline TP53 variant.
• Testing in childhood of first-degree relatives of individuals with germline disease-causing TP53 variants should be systematically offered, if database shows that the variant can be considered as a high cancer risk TP53 variant conferring a high cancer risk in childhood.”
   

References 

1. Aury-Landas, J., Bougeard, G., Castel, H., Hernandez-Vargas, H., Drouet, A., Latouche, J. B., Schouft, M. T., Ferec, C., Leroux, D., Lasset, C., Coupier, I., Caron, O., Herceg, Z., Frebourg, T., & Flaman, J. M. (2013). Germline copy number variation of genes involved in chromatin remodelling in families suggestive of Li-Fraumeni syndrome with brain tumours. Eur J Hum Genet, 21(12), 1369-1376. https://doi.org/10.1038/ejhg.2013.68 
2. Bachinski, L. L., Olufemi, S. E., Zhou, X., Wu, C. C., Yip, L., Shete, S., Lozano, G., Amos, C. I., Strong, L. C., & Krahe, R. (2005). Genetic mapping of a third Li-Fraumeni syndrome predisposition locus to human chromosome 1q23. Cancer Res, 65(2), 427-431. 
3. Bakhuizen, J. J., Hogervorst, F. B., Velthuizen, M. E., Ruijs, M. W., van Engelen, K., van Os, T. A., Gille, J. J., Collee, M., van den Ouweland, A. M., van Asperen, C. J., Kets, C. M., Mensenkamp, A. R., Leter, E. M., Blok, M. J., de Jong, M. M., & Ausems, M. G. (2019). TP53 germline mutation testing in early-onset breast cancer: findings from a nationwide cohort. Fam Cancer, 18(2), 273-280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10689-018-00118-0 
4. Barlow, J. W., Mous, M., Wiley, J. C., Varley, J. M., Lozano, G., Strong, L. C., & Malkin, D. (2004). Germ line BAX alterations are infrequent in Li-Fraumeni syndrome. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 13(8), 1403-1406. 
5. Batalini, F., Peacock, E. G., Stobie, L., Robertson, A., Garber, J., Weitzel, J. N., & Tung, N. M. (2019). Li-Fraumeni syndrome: not a straightforward diagnosis anymore-the interpretation of pathogenic variants of low allele frequency and the differences between germline PVs, mosaicism, and clonal hematopoiesis. Breast Cancer Res, 21(1), 107. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13058-019-1193-1 
6. Birch, J. M., Blair, V., Kelsey, A. M., Evans, D. G., Harris, M., Tricker, K. J., & Varley, J. M. (1998). Cancer phenotype correlates with constitutional TP53 genotype in families with the Li-Fraumeni syndrome. Oncogene, 17(9), 1061-1068. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1202033 
7. Birch, J. M., Hartley, A. L., Tricker, K. J., Prosser, J., Condie, A., Kelsey, A. M., Harris, M., Jones, P. H., Binchy, A., Crowther, D., & et al. (1994). Prevalence and diversity of constitutional mutations in the p53 gene among 21 Li-Fraumeni families. Cancer Res, 54(5), 1298-1304. http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/54/5/1298.long 
8. BluePrint. (2020). TP53 single gene test. https://blueprintgenetics.com/tests/single-gene-tests/tp53-single-gene-test-2/
9. Bougeard, G., Limacher, J. M., Martin, C., Charbonnier, F., Killian, A., Delattre, O., Longy, M., Jonveaux, P., Fricker, J. P., Stoppa-Lyonnet, D., Flaman, J. M., & Frebourg, T. (2001). Detection of 11 germline inactivating TP53 mutations and absence of TP63 and HCHK2 mutations in 17 French families with Li-Fraumeni or Li-Fraumeni-like syndrome. J Med Genet, 38(4), 253-257. 
10. Bougeard, G., Renaux-Petel, M., Flaman, J. M., Charbonnier, C., Fermey, P., Belotti, M., Gauthier-Villars, M., Stoppa-Lyonnet, D., Consolino, E., Brugieres, L., Caron, O., Benusiglio, P. R., Bressac-de Paillerets, B., Bonadona, V., Bonaiti-Pellie, C., Tinat, J., Baert-Desurmont, S., & Frebourg, T. (2015). Revisiting Li-Fraumeni Syndrome From TP53 Mutation Carriers. J Clin Oncol, 33(21), 2345-2352. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2014.59.5728 
11. Bougeard, G., Renaux-Petel, M., Flaman, J. M., Charbonnier, C., Fermey, P., Belotti, M., Gauthier-Villars, M., Stoppa-Lyonnet, D., Consolino, E., Brugières, L., Caron, O., Benusiglio, P. R., Bressac-de Paillerets, B., Bonadona, V., Bonaïti-Pellié, C., Tinat, J., Baert-Desurmont, S., & Frebourg, T. (2015). Revisiting Li-Fraumeni Syndrome From TP53 Mutation Carriers. J Clin Oncol, 33(21), 2345-2352. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2014.59.5728 
12. Bougeard, G., Sesboue, R., Baert-Desurmont, S., Vasseur, S., Martin, C., Tinat, J., Brugieres, L., Chompret, A., de Paillerets, B. B., Stoppa-Lyonnet, D., Bonaiti-Pellie, C., Frebourg, T., & French, L. F. S. w. g. (2008). Molecular basis of the Li-Fraumeni syndrome: an update from the French LFS families. J Med Genet, 45(8), 535-538. https://doi.org/10.1136/jmg.2008.057570 
13. Brosh, R., & Rotter, V. (2009). When mutants gain new powers: news from the mutant p53 field. Nat Rev Cancer, 9(10), 701-713. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc2693 
14. Brown, L. T., Sexsmith, E., & Malkin, D. (2000). Identification of a novel PTEN intronic deletion in Li-Fraumeni syndrome and its effect on RNA processing. Cancer Genet Cytogenet, 123(1), 65-68. 
15. Chompret, A., Abel, A., Stoppa-Lyonnet, D., Brugieres, L., Pages, S., Feunteun, J., & Bonaiti-Pellie, C. (2001). Sensitivity and predictive value of criteria for p53 germline mutation screening. J Med Genet, 38(1), 43-47. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1734716/pdf/v038p00043.pdf 
16. Chompret, A., Brugieres, L., Ronsin, M., Gardes, M., Dessarps-Freichey, F., Abel, A., Hua, D., Ligot, L., Dondon, M. G., Bressac-de Paillerets, B., Frebourg, T., Lemerle, J., Bonaiti-Pellie, C., & Feunteun, J. (2000). P53 germline mutations in childhood cancers and cancer risk for carrier individuals. Br J Cancer, 82(12), 1932-1937. https://doi.org/10.1054/bjoc.2000.1167 
17. Correa, H. (2016). Li-Fraumeni Syndrome. J Pediatr Genet, 5(2), 84-88. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1579759 
18. Eeles, R. A. (1995). Germline mutations in the TP53 gene. Cancer Surv, 25, 101-124. http://dx.doi.org/ 
19. Evans, D. G. (2021, February 25). Li-Fraumeni syndrome. https://www.uptodate.com/contents/li-fraumeni-syndrome
20. Farrell, C. J., & Plotkin, S. R. (2007). Genetic causes of brain tumors: neurofibromatosis, tuberous sclerosis, von Hippel-Lindau, and other syndromes. Neurol Clin, 25(4), 925-946, viii. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ncl.2007.07.008 
21. Fortuno, C., Lee, K., Olivier, M., Pesaran, T., Mai, P. L., de Andrade, K. C., Attardi, L. D., Crowley, S., Evans, D. G., Feng, B. J., Foreman, A. K. M., Frone, M. N., Huether, R., James, P. A., McGoldrick, K., Mester, J., Seifert, B. A., Slavin, T. P., Witkowski, L., . . . Savage, S. A. (2021). Specifications of the ACMG/AMP variant interpretation guidelines for germline TP53 variants. Hum Mutat, 42(3), 223-236. https://doi.org/10.1002/humu.24152 
22. Garber, J. E., Goldstein, A. M., Kantor, A. F., Dreyfus, M. G., Fraumeni, J. F., Jr., & Li, F. P. (1991). Follow-up study of twenty-four families with Li-Fraumeni syndrome. Cancer Res, 51(22), 6094-6097. 
23. Gonzalez, K. D., Noltner, K. A., Buzin, C. H., Gu, D., Wen-Fong, C. Y., Nguyen, V. Q., Han, J. H., Lowstuter, K., Longmate, J., Sommer, S. S., & Weitzel, J. N. (2009). Beyond Li Fraumeni Syndrome: clinical characteristics of families with p53 germline mutations. J Clin Oncol, 27(8), 1250-1256. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2008.16.6959 
24. Herrmann, L. J., Heinze, B., Fassnacht, M., Willenberg, H. S., Quinkler, M., Reisch, N., Zink, M., Allolio, B., & Hahner, S. (2012). TP53 germline mutations in adult patients with adrenocortical carcinoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 97(3), E476-485. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2011-1982 
25. Hwang, S. J., Lozano, G., Amos, C. I., & Strong, L. C. (2003). Germline p53 mutations in a cohort with childhood sarcoma: sex differences in cancer risk. Am J Hum Genet, 72(4), 975-983. https://doi.org/10.1086/374567 
26. Invitae. (2020). Invitae Li-Fraumeni Syndrome Test. https://www.invitae.com/en/physician/tests/01705/
27. Kalia, S. S., Adelman, K., Bale, S. J., Chung, W. K., Eng, C., Evans, J. P., Herman, G. E., Hufnagel, S. B., Klein, T. E., Korf, B. R., McKelvey, K. D., Ormond, K. E., Richards, C. S., Vlangos, C. N., Watson, M., Martin, C. L., & Miller, D. T. (2017). Recommendations for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing, 2016 update (ACMG SF v2.0): a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. Genet Med, 19(2), 249-255. https://doi.org/10.1038/gim.2016.190 
28. LFSA. (2021). CRITERIA FOR LFS | LI-FRAUMENI SYNDROME ASSOCIATION. Li-Fraumeni Syndrome Association. Retrieved 05/15/2019 from https://www.lfsassociation.org/what-is-lfs/lfs-critieria/
29. Li, F. P., Fraumeni, J. F., Jr., Mulvihill, J. J., Blattner, W. A., Dreyfus, M. G., Tucker, M. A., & Miller, R. W. (1988). A cancer family syndrome in twenty-four kindreds. Cancer Res, 48(18), 5358-5362. http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/48/18/5358.long 
30. Lincoln, S. E., Nussbaum, R. L., Kurian, A. W., Nielsen, S. M., Das, K., Michalski, S., Yang, S., Ngo, N., Blanco, A., & Esplin, E. D. (2020). Yield and Utility of Germline Testing Following Tumor Sequencing in Patients With Cancer. JAMA Netw Open, 3(10), e2019452. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.19452 
31. Lustbader, E. D., Williams, W. R., Bondy, M. L., Strom, S., & Strong, L. C. (1992). Segregation analysis of cancer in families of childhood soft-tissue-sarcoma patients. Am J Hum Genet, 51(2), 344-356. 
32. Lynch, H. T., Mulcahy, G. M., Harris, R. E., Guirgis, H. A., & Lynch, J. F. (1978). Genetic and pathologic findings in a kindred with hereditary sarcoma, breast cancer, brain tumors, leukemia, lung, laryngeal, and adrenal cortical carcinoma. Cancer, 41(5), 2055-2064. 
33. Mai, P. L., Best, A. F., Peters, J. A., DeCastro, R. M., Khincha, P. P., Loud, J. T., Bremer, R. C., Rosenberg, P. S., & Savage, S. A. (2016). Risks of first and subsequent cancers among TP53 mutation carriers in the National Cancer Institute Li-Fraumeni syndrome cohort. Cancer, 122(23), 3673-3681. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.30248 
34. Mai, P. L., Malkin, D., Garber, J. E., Schiffman, J. D., Weitzel, J. N., Strong, L. C., Wyss, O., Locke, L., Means, V., Achatz, M. I., Hainaut, P., Frebourg, T., Evans, D. G., Bleiker, E., Patenaude, A., Schneider, K., Wilfond, B., Peters, J. A., Hwang, P. M., . . . Savage, S. A. (2012). Li-Fraumeni syndrome: report of a clinical research workshop and creation of a research consortium. Cancer Genet, 205(10), 479-487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cancergen.2012.06.008 
35. Malkin, D. (2011). Li-fraumeni syndrome. Genes Cancer, 2(4), 475-484. https://doi.org/10.1177/1947601911413466 
36. Malkin, D., Li, F. P., Strong, L. C., Fraumeni, J. F., Jr., Nelson, C. E., Kim, D. H., Kassel, J., Gryka, M. A., Bischoff, F. Z., Tainsky, M. A., & et al. (1990). Germ line p53 mutations in a familial syndrome of breast cancer, sarcomas, and other neoplasms. Science, 250(4985), 1233-1238. 
37. Manahan, E. R., Kuerer, H. M., Sebastian, M., Hughes, K. S., Boughey, J. C., Euhus, D. M., Boolbol, S. K., & Taylor, W. A. (2019). Consensus Guidelines on Genetic` Testing for Hereditary Breast Cancer from the American Society of Breast Surgeons. Ann Surg Oncol, 26(10), 3025-3031. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-019-07549-8 
38. Masciari, S., Dewanwala, A., Stoffel, E. M., Lauwers, G. Y., Zheng, H., Achatz, M. I., Riegert-Johnson, D., Foretova, L., Silva, E. M., Digianni, L., Verselis, S. J., Schneider, K., Li, F. P., Fraumeni, J., Garber, J. E., & Syngal, S. (2011). Gastric cancer in individuals with Li-Fraumeni syndrome. Genet Med, 13(7), 651-657. https://doi.org/10.1097/GIM.0b013e31821628b6 
39. McBride, K. A., Ballinger, M. L., Killick, E., Kirk, J., Tattersall, M. H., Eeles, R. A., Thomas, D. M., & Mitchell, G. (2014). Li-Fraumeni syndrome: cancer risk assessment and clinical management. Nat Rev Clin Oncol, 11(5), 260-271. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrclinonc.2014.41 
40. Nagy, R., Sweet, K., & Eng, C. (2004). Highly penetrant hereditary cancer syndromes. Oncogene, 23(38), 6445-6470. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1207714 
41. NCCN. (2022a). Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Breast, Ovarian, and Pancreatic Version 2.2022 https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/genetics_bop.pdf 
42. NCCN. (2022b). NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology; Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Breast and Ovarian v2.2022. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/genetics_screening.pdf
43. NORD. (2021). Li-Fraumeni Syndrome. https://rarediseases.org/rare-diseases/li-fraumeni-syndrome/
44. Ognjanovic, S., Olivier, M., Bergemann, T. L., & Hainaut, P. (2012). Sarcomas in TP53 germline mutation carriers: a review of the IARC TP53 database. Cancer, 118(5), 1387-1396. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.26390 
45. Olivier, M., Goldgar, D. E., Sodha, N., Ohgaki, H., Kleihues, P., Hainaut, P., & Eeles, R. A. (2003). Li-Fraumeni and related syndromes: correlation between tumor type, family structure, and TP53 genotype. Cancer Res, 63(20), 6643-6650. http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=14583457 
46. Olivier, M., Hollstein, M., & Hainaut, P. (2010). TP53 mutations in human cancers: origins, consequences, and clinical use. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol, 2(1), a001008. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a001008 
47. Palmero, E. I., Achatz, M. I., Ashton-Prolla, P., Olivier, M., & Hainaut, P. (2010). Tumor protein 53 mutations and inherited cancer: beyond Li-Fraumeni syndrome. Curr Opin Oncol, 22(1), 64-69. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCO.0b013e328333bf00 
48. Peshkin, B. N. I., Claudine,. (2022). Genetic testing and management of individuals at risk of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndromes. https://www.uptodate.com/contents/genetic-testing-and-management-of-individuals-at-risk-of-hereditary-breast-and-ovarian-cancer-syndromes#H15 
49. Petitjean, A., Mathe, E., Kato, S., Ishioka, C., Tavtigian, S. V., Hainaut, P., & Olivier, M. (2007). Impact of mutant p53 functional properties on TP53 mutation patterns and tumor phenotype: lessons from recent developments in the IARC TP53 database. Hum Mutat, 28(6), 622-629. https://doi.org/10.1002/humu.20495 
50. Portwine, C., Lees, J., Verselis, S., Li, F. P., & Malkin, D. (2000). Absence of germline p16(INK4a) alterations in p53 wild type Li-Fraumeni syndrome families. J Med Genet, 37(8), E13. 
51. Rana, H. Q., Gelman, R., LaDuca, H., McFarland, R., Dalton, E., Thompson, J., Speare, V., Dolinsky, J. S., Chao, E. C., & Garber, J. E. (2018). Differences in TP53 Mutation Carrier Phenotypes Emerge From Panel-Based Testing. J Natl Cancer Inst. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djy001 
52. Ruijs, M. W., Verhoef, S., Rookus, M. A., Pruntel, R., van der Hout, A. H., Hogervorst, F. B., Kluijt, I., Sijmons, R. H., Aalfs, C. M., Wagner, A., Ausems, M. G., Hoogerbrugge, N., van Asperen, C. J., Gomez Garcia, E. B., Meijers-Heijboer, H., Ten Kate, L. P., Menko, F. H., & van 't Veer, L. J. (2010). TP53 germline mutation testing in 180 families suspected of Li-Fraumeni syndrome: mutation detection rate and relative frequency of cancers in different familial phenotypes. In J Med Genet (Vol. 47, pp. 421-428). https://doi.org/10.1136/jmg.2009.073429 
53. Schneider, K., Zelley, K., Nichols, K. E., & Garber, J. (2013a). Li-Fraumeni Syndrome. In R. A. Pagon, M. P. Adam, H. H. Ardinger, S. E. Wallace, A. Amemiya, L. J. Bean, T. D. Bird, N. Ledbetter, H. C. Mefford, R. J. Smith, & K. Stephens (Eds.), GeneReviews. University of Washington, Seattle. https://doi.org/https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK1311/ 
54. Schneider, K., Zelley, K., Nichols, K. E., & Garber, J. (2013b). Li-Fraumeni Syndrome [Text]. https://doi.org/https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK1311/ 
55. Sigal, A., & Rotter, V. (2000). Oncogenic mutations of the p53 tumor suppressor: the demons of the guardian of the genome. Cancer Res, 60(24), 6788-6793. 
56. Sorrell, A. D., Espenschied, C. R., Culver, J. O., & Weitzel, J. N. (2013). TP53 Testing and Li-Fraumeni Syndrome: Current Status of Clinical Applications and Future Directions. Mol Diagn Ther, 17(1), 31-47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40291-013-0020-0 
57. Stone, J. G., Eeles, R. A., Sodha, N., Murday, V., Sheriden, E., & Houlston, R. S. (1999). Analysis of Li-Fraumeni syndrome and Li-Fraumeni-like families for germline mutations in Bcl10. Cancer Lett, 147(1-2), 181-185. 
58. Terradas, M., Mur, P., Belhadj, S., Woodward, E. R., Burghel, G. J., Munoz-Torres, P. M., Quintana, I., Navarro, M., Brunet, J., Lazaro, C., Pineda, M., Moreno, V., Capella, G., Evans, D. G. R., & Valle, L. (2021). <em>TP53</em>, a gene for colorectal cancer predisposition in the absence of Li-Fraumeni-associated phenotypes. Gut, 70(6), 1139-1146. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2020-321825 
59. Tinat, J., Bougeard, G., Baert-Desurmont, S., Vasseur, S., Martin, C., Bouvignies, E., Caron, O., Bressac-de Paillerets, B., Berthet, P., Dugast, C., Bonaiti-Pellie, C., Stoppa-Lyonnet, D., & Frebourg, T. (2009). 2009 version of the Chompret criteria for Li Fraumeni syndrome. J Clin Oncol, 27(26), e108-109; author reply e110. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2009.22.7967 
60. Varley, J. M. (2003). Germline TP53 mutations and Li-Fraumeni syndrome. Hum Mutat, 21(3), 313-320. https://doi.org/10.1002/humu.10185 
61. Villani, A., Shore, A., Wasserman, J. D., Stephens, D., Kim, R. H., Druker, H., Gallinger, B., Naumer, A., Kohlmann, W., Novokmet, A., Tabori, U., Tijerin, M., Greer, M. L., Finlay, J. L., Schiffman, J. D., & Malkin, D. (2016). Biochemical and imaging surveillance in germline TP53 mutation carriers with Li-Fraumeni syndrome: 11 year follow-up of a prospective observational study. Lancet Oncol, 17(9), 1295-1305. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(16)30249-2 
62. Villani, A., Tabori, U., Schiffman, J., Shlien, A., Beyene, J., Druker, H., Novokmet, A., Finlay, J., & Malkin, D. (2011). Biochemical and imaging surveillance in germline TP53 mutation carriers with Li-Fraumeni syndrome: a prospective observational study. Lancet Oncol, 12(6), 559-567. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(11)70119-x 
63. Walsh, T., Casadei, S., Lee, M. K., Pennil, C. C., Nord, A. S., Thornton, A. M., Roeb, W., Agnew, K. J., Stray, S. M., Wickramanayake, A., Norquist, B., Pennington, K. P., Garcia, R. L., King, M. C., & Swisher, E. M. (2011). Mutations in 12 genes for inherited ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal carcinoma identified by massively parallel sequencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 108(44), 18032-18037. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1115052108 
64. Wong, P., Verselis, S. J., Garber, J. E., Schneider, K., DiGianni, L., Stockwell, D. H., Li, F. P., & Syngal, S. (2006). Prevalence of early onset colorectal cancer in 397 patients with classic Li-Fraumeni syndrome. Gastroenterology, 130(1), 73-79. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2005.10.014 
65. Yamamoto, Y., Kanai, M., Kou, T., Sugiyama, A., Nakamura, E., Miyake, H., Yamada, T., Nishigaki, M., Kondo, T., Murakami, H., Torishima, M., Matsumoto, S., Kosugi, S., & Muto, M. (2020). Clinical significance of TP53 variants as possible secondary findings in tumor-only next-generation sequencing. Journal of Human Genetics, 65(2), 125-132. https://doi.org/10.1038/s10038-019-0681-6

Coding Section

Procedure and diagnosis codes on Medical Policy documents are included only as a general reference tool for each policy. They may not be all-inclusive.  

This medical policy was developed through consideration of peer-reviewed medical literature generally recognized by the relevant medical community, U.S. FDA approval status, nationally accepted standards of medical practice and accepted standards of medical practice in this community, Blue Cross Blue Shield Association technology assessment program (TEC) and other nonaffiliated technology evaluation centers, reference to federal regulations, other plan medical policies, and accredited national guidelines.

"Current Procedural Terminology © American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved" 

History From 2014 Forward