Policy 
Legibility of Records
All entries must be legible to another reader to a degree that a meaningful review may be conducted. Providers must use care to ensure that records are not rendered illegible by poor handwriting or poor copy quality. When illegible records are received, the services are considered not documented and, therefore, non-billable and cannot be reimbursed. 

Note: It is not acceptable to obscure portions of the record in any way (e.g., whiting out, blacking out, covering with paper, etc.). This renders that portion of the record illegible and is an alteration of the medical record. When records are received with information obscured, services may be denied because:

• A portion of the records are illegible and/or unreadable.
• The records have been altered.
• We are unable to verify that we have complete and accurate information upon which to base our determination.

Providing Records for Review
The "burden of proof" remains with the provider to substantiate services and/or supplies billed. All information required to support the codes and services submitted on the claim is expected to be in the member’s medical record and be available for review. The provider submitting the claim is responsible for providing upon request all pertinent information and records needed to support the services billed. When the billing provider receives a letter or fax requesting information needed for an audit or review, if the requested documents and information are not received within the required time frame, the record is deemed not to exist, and the services not documented. If the documentation is incomplete or insufficient to support the services, then the service or item will be considered as not documented.

At times, some providers choose to house test reports or other elements of the documentation at a different location from the office or facility. For example, the physician may bill for reading an EKG or X-ray performed in the hospital or the ASC/facility may bill the facility fees for a surgery but not keep a copy of the operative report. Because the billing provider is required to submit documentation to support billed charges upon request, it would be best practice if both the physician and the facility keep a copy of the relevant reports in their records so that it is readily available when needed. Otherwise, the billing provider is responsible for obtaining a copy of the needed records from the other location/provider and submitting them within the time frame specified in the request. When the response to a medical records request indicates the billing provider does not have a copy of the records to support the billed services/codes and instructs the health plan to contact another provider for the needed records, the services will be denied as not documented.

Any records, documentation or information not received in response to the original records request or discovered after the review is complete will be considered for possible reconsideration of the review. Please ensure that your response to records requests is both prompt and complete. 

When services (procedure codes) are not documented or are insufficiently documented, the record does not support that the services were performed, so they are not billable; there is no justification for the services or level of care billed. Therefore, services that are determined to be not documented are denied to provider responsibility and the member should not be balance billed for the items. If the claim has already been adjudicated (e.g., claim already released, postpayment audit), the reimbursement is considered an overpayment. A refund will be requested and the funds recovered if necessary.

Items Not Considered Part of the Medical Record
Supporting documentation for all billed services must be contained in the patient’s written medical record. The following items are specifically not considered part of the medical record (not an all-inclusive list):

• Notations on the claim.
  • Any notations on the claim (e.g., size, dose, quantity, make, model, anatomical location, etc.) must be supported within the medical record itself.
• Notations or comments on a fax cover sheet, records request letter, cover letter, etc., in lieu of records or accompanying the submitted records
• Phone statements
  • Any information provided in phone statements discussing a claim or billed services must be supported within the medical record itself.
• Appointment books, schedules, ledgers, logs, etc. (electronic or hard copy)
• Appeal letters and/or reconsideration requests
  • Appeal letters or reconsideration requests are useful to describe the basis for the appeal and reference supporting information. However, any information regarding the patient’s condition and/or the services provided must be supported within the medical record itself. 

Correct Reporting of Units
Units of service must be reported correctly.

Each HCPCS/CPT code has a defined unit of service for reporting purposes. A physician or facility should not report units of service for a HCPCS/CPT code using a criterion that differs from the code’s defined unit of service.

Time-Based Services 
For any time-based procedure codes (codes with descriptions that specify an increment of time, such as minutes or hours) the duration of the service must be clearly documented in the medical record. If the duration of the time-based service is not clearly and properly documented in the medical record, then the service is not supported due to incomplete documentation; the procedure code will be denied as not documented.

• Documentation in terms of "units" does not constitute documentation of time or duration. The actual number of minutes or begin-to-end times must be used.
• A unit of time is attained when the mid-point is passed. (This is consistent with the Medicare "8-minute rule" and CPT book guidelines on reporting time-based services.⁶)
• Time must be reported in full one-minute increments. Any fractions of less than one minute will not be considered in the review.
• If the time is documented with a range of time, only the lowest amount of time is considered to be supported in the record. Example: "Total time for performing exercises is 5 – 8 minutes." Only five minutes is supported by this documentation.
• If the amount of time the service was performed is less than 50 percent of the time described for the procedure code, then the service will not be separately reimbursable but will be considered incidental to the other services performed on that date. 

If more than one procedure code is billed for the same date of service, then to fully support all of the billed services, the time must be separately documented for each specific procedure or time-based service. This will clearly document what portion of the total visit was spent performing each of the billed codes.

Methods and examples for time documentation
Acceptable:

• Specific number of minutes. Example: "Manual therapy to lumbar spine x 15 minutes."
• Listing begin-time and end-time for service. Example: "E-stim to cervical neck, 09:30 – 09:45."

Unacceptable:

• Documenting time in terms of "units". Examples: "One unit of pulsed ultrasound was administered" or "Ther Ex 1 unit."
• Documenting time using a range. Example: "Therapeutic activities x 6 – 12 minutes as appropriate per assessment and symptoms."
• Documenting a quantity but not specifying the measurement or increment used. Example: "97110 Exercises x 2."
• No time mentioned at all. Example: Checking or circling "NMR" or "TE" with no additional information documented.

Quantities and Measurements
Quantities and measurements must be specified in the documentation to support the codes and units of service billed.

• When quantities are not specified, the use of a singular noun or term supports a quantity of one. The use of a plural term (e.g., "lesions," "screws," "inches," "warts," "injections," etc.) will support more than one but only two of that item or service and no more. For example: "Several" is not a specific quantity and is also considered a nonspecific plural that supports only a quantity of two for billing purposes.
  • "Lesion" supports one lesion.
  • "Lesions" supports two lesions.
  • "Two lesions" supports two lesions.
  • "Three lesions" supports three lesions. 
  • "Four lesions" supports four lesions.
  • Etcetera.
• "A couple" designates a quantity of two and no more for billing purposes.
• Documentation in terms of "units" or the CPT or HCPCS code does not constitute documentation of quantity or measurement. The number of inches (in), centimeters (cm), milliliters (ml), milligrams (mg), cubic centimeters (cc), etc. must be documented as the quantity, length or measurement. That documentation will then be translated into the correct number of units to bill, based upon the quantity specified in the applicable code description. 

For example: 
The documentation states 205 mg of etoposide was given. 
Etoposide is billed with HCPCS code J9181 (Injection, etoposide, 10 mg).
205 mg given/10 mg per unit of J9181 = 20.5 units.
20.5 units is rounded up to nearest whole unit = bill with J9181 x 21 units.

• If quantities or measurements are documented with a statement of range (e.g., 2 – 3 inches), then only the lowest of the range stated is considered supported in the documentation.

Some procedure codes do not specify a quantity or unit of measurement in the procedure definition, but the coding guidelines for the use or separate reimbursement of that service require some type of quantity or measurement to be included in the documentation of that service.

For example:
The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) considers a claviculectomy (23120, 29824) performed in combination with other shoulder procedures to be separately billable only if "excision of the entire distal clavicle (approx 1 cm) is completed." If the amount or measurement of the clavicle removed is not documented, the service is not eligible for separate reimbursement, and any use of modifier 59 or XS is not supported.

Signature Requirements

• All services provided to beneficiaries are expected to be documented in the medical records at the time they are rendered.
• All medical record entries must include (among other things) the date of service, and a legible, dated, and timed signature of the provider.
• Providers should not add late signatures to the medical record, other than those that result from the short delay that occurs during the transcription process.
• If the signature is illegible, providers may submit a signature log or attestation to support the identity of the signer.

Documentation of Orders for Tests and Services
Many services, both diagnostic and therapeutic, require physician/provider orders to be performed. For example, chest X-rays, CAT scans, EKGs, laboratory tests, issuing DME items, dispensing prescription medications, etc. Accurate and complete documentation of a valid and specific provider order for these services (e.g., laboratory testing) is an essential element of supporting documentation to verify the services for reimbursement purposes.

• A requisition form signed and dated by the treating physician is one acceptable method of documenting the physician order.
• Instead of a signed and dated requisition form, the billing office may provide medical documentation by the treating physician showing that he/she intended the clinical diagnostic test be performed.
  • Examples include progress note, office visit note, operative report noting specimens submitted and tests requested.
  • Specific tests requested must be identified, not just "labs sent," "custom profile," etc.
  • This alternative documentation from the treating physician’s medical records must be signed and dated.

The full list of requirements and alternative acceptable documentation that the treating physician ordered the test(s) or service(s) is provided below.

Provider orders must be:

• From a licensed provider who has evaluated the patient.
• Signed and dated.
  • Orders must be dated on or prior to the date of service.
  • Verbal orders or telephone orders for a test or service may be countersigned by the physician after test or service has been performed if:
    • The verbal/telephone order is fully documented with the date, time, name, and credentials of the person supplying and receiving the order and,
    • The order is countersigned by the ordering provider as soon as possible after the verbal/telephone order, but no later than 30 days after the order was given.
  • Electronic signatures from the ordering provider are acceptable in electronic health records.
  • Electronic signatures from office staff working in the ordering provider’s office are not acceptable.
  • "Signature On File" is not acceptable as a valid signature from the provider. "Signature On File" is also not considered an electronic provider signature. Requisitions submitted with "Signature On File" are considered unsigned by the provider.
  • If handwritten, the signature must be legible, or verifiable as the actual ordering provider’s signature (for example, accompanied by copy of provider signature log).
• Specific to an individual member and to the individual member’s medical treatment plan.
  • • The order needs to include the member’s name and any other means of identifying the member to be tested.
    • An order/requisition for a ‘custom profile,’ or any similar document, used to establish general instructions for testing all patients of a physician or practice, is not appropriate documentation.
• Specific regarding the test or services to be performed.
  • • Any orders or requisitions referring to the ‘custom profile,’ or any similar document, as the means of designating which tests are to be performed is not appropriate documentation.
• Orders for an ongoing series of regular tests and/or services shall be valid to support services for no longer than one year (365 days) from the date of the signed order. For additional tests or services in the series after the original order expires, an updated signed order will need to be obtained and kept on file.
• May be substantiated in the visit records if specific orders are documented in the visit notes and if the notes are signed. ("Order labs" is not specific, but "Order K+ level & lipid panel" is specific.)
• Supplied for review upon request.

If records are requested for review, laboratory studies and other services which require a provider order that do not have a documented provider order as described above will be denied for lack of supporting documentation. 

Cloning of Medical Records
Cloned medical records entries are not reliable as an accurate record of the events and services depicted. All documentation in the medical record must:

• Be specific to the patient.
• Be specific to the situation at the time of the encounter.
• Accurately reflect the services performed.
• Support the necessity for the services.
• Clearly identify who performed the services and assessments documented.
• Clearly identify the author of each note or entry.
• Clearly identify the date and time the entry was made.

Services are considered not documented when cloned documentation is found or identified, and services will be denied due to the lack of supporting documentation. If services have previously been allowed, refund requests and recoupment of payment may occur.

Cloned documentation is considered a misrepresentation of the events and services in that entry and a falsification of the medical record; the accuracy and validity of the entire entry is damaged. Other entries in the record may also become suspect.

Medical records documentation is considered cloned when:

• Multiple entries in a patient chart are identical or similar to other entries in the same chart.
• Entries in the medical record are identical or similar from patient to patient to patient, without expected unique variations. It would not be expected that every patient had the exact same problem, symptoms, and required the exact same treatment.
• Information from previous entries of the same provider or other providers is pulled forward into the current entry, particularly when it is not updated or not relevant to the current encounter.
• In other words, copying and pasting, pulling forward information, and the use of macros or templates could all be considered cloning.

Over-documentation is the practice of inserting false or irrelevant documentation to create the appearance of support for billing higher level services. Vast amounts of clinical data and whole text from previous notes or the initial history and physical do not add value or clarity to the medical record; the story of the patient and the services becomes muddled and obscured under a deluge of clinical information that may not even be relevant or current.

Although the problem has certainly become more prevalent with the advent and increased use of electronic medical records systems (EHR/EMR), cloning of medical records can occur in all types of medical record formats (handwritten, dictated, typed and electronic).

Records Considered for Review
The following documentation will be considered when determining the validity of services billed and the processing of the claim:

• Documentation submitted for the initial review and part of the original medical record
  • Note: Phone statements, appeal letters, reconsideration requests, notations on the claim, etc., are not considered part of the original medical record.
• Corrections to the medical record will be considered when all of the following criteria are met:
  • Legally amended
    • Note: For guidelines regarding legal corrections and amendments to medical records, please see "Documentation Guidelines — Amended Records," which is attached at the end of this document. 
  • Amended within 30-days of date of service (outpatient) or date of discharge (inpatient)
  • Amended prior to claims submission and/or medical review
  • Amendment contains signature, date of amendment, and reason for the addition or clarification of information being added to the medical record

The following documentation will not be considered when determining the validity of services billed and the processing of the claim:

• Changes or amendments that appear in the record more than 30 days after the date of service/discharge
• Changes or amendments made after a records request
• Changes or amendments made after a payment determination
• Medical records with information obscured or blocked in some manner (e.g., type correction fluid, black marker, etc.)
• Documentation or statements that is/are not part of the medical record
  • Phone calls or other verbal statements
  • Statements in appeal letters or other written documentation made in lieu of corrections or amendments to the medical record

Reconsiderations and Appeals
Appeal of claims denied on the basis of an incomplete record may result in a reversal of the original denial if the information supplied includes pages or components that were part of the original medical record, but were not submitted on the initial review.  

Background Information
All healthcare entities and providers are required to keep medical records. These records are a legal document, which serves both clinical needs and to substantiate the services and items billed on the claim submitted.

Incomplete or illegible records can result in denial of reimbursement for services billed. Claim payment decisions that result from a medical review of records are not a reflection on the provider’s competence as a health care professional or the quality of care provided to the patient/member. Specifically, the results are based on review of the documentation that was received.

Codes, Terms, and Definitions

Acronyms Defined

Coding Guidelines
"Select the name of the procedure or service that accurately identifies the service performed. Do not select a CPT code that merely approximates the service provided. If no such specific code exists, then report the service using the appropriate unlisted procedure or service code."

When submitting claims to the carrier, procedure codes are to be selected based upon the services documented in the patient’s medical record at the time of code selection. The CPT/ICD-9 codes reported on the health insurance claim form or billing statement should reflect the documentation in the medical record. 

References  

1. Noridian Medicare. "Documentation Guidelines - Amended Records." Medicare B News, Issue 207, October 14, 2003. June 27, 2014 <https://www.noridianmedicare.com/provider/updates/docs/doc_Guides_amend_records_reprint.pdf>. See Attachment at end of this list.
2. American Medical Association. "Instructions for Use of the CPT Codebook." Current Procedural Terminology (CPT), Introduction. Chicago: AMA Press.
3. American Medical Association. "Coding Clarification: Principles of Documentation", CPT Assistant, Summer 1992, page 21.
4. American Medical Association. "Coding Consultation: Documentation Guidelines, No Use of Templates (Q&A)", CPT Assistant, January 1998, page 11.
5. Roach, William H. Jr., MS, JD; Hoban, Robert G., JD; Broccolo, Bernadette M., JD; Roth, Andrew B., JD; Blanchard, Timothy P., MHA, JD. Medical Records and the Law. American Health Information Management Association (AHIMA). Sundbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett Publishers, 2006.
6. American Medical Association. "Time." Current Procedural Terminology (CPT), Introduction. Chicago: AMA Press.
7. "Documentation Guidelines for Medicare Services." Noridian Medicare. September 15, 2013. May 18, 2017 < https://med.noridianmedicare.com/web/jeb/cert-reviews/mr/documentation-guidelines-for-medicare-services >
8. "Record of Care, Treatment, and Services; Timeliness, RC.01.03.01." The Joint Commission (formerly Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO)) Hospitals (CAMH) Program Manual. 2012: August 6, 2014. http://www.uhnj.org/mdstfweb/The_Joint_Commission/Record%20of%20Care%20Treatment%20%20Services.pdf
9. "Authentication of Documentation." The Joint Commission. FAQ, Record of Care, Treatment, and Services (CAMH / Hospitals). November 24, 2008: August 6, 2014. <http://www.jointcommission.org/standards_information/jcfaqdetails.aspx?StandardsFAQId=8&StandardsFAQChapterId=79>.
10. CMS. National Correct Coding Initiative Policy Manual. Chapter 1 General Correct Coding Policies, § A.
11. OIG. "Not All Recommended Fraud Safeguards Have Been Implemented in Hospital EHR Technology." (Report OEI-01-11-00570) December 2013. April 2015. < https://oig.hhs.gov/oei/reports/oei-01-11-00570.pdf>.
12. FCSO Medicare. "Cloning of Medical Notes." The Florida Medicare B Update, third quarter 2006 (vol. 4, no. 3), pg. 4.
13. Hall, Kellie S., CPC, CPCO, CCS-P. "Cloning: Address the Elephant in the Room." AAPC Healthcare Business Monthly Archive. March 2015. April 2015. < http://news.aapc.com/cloning-address-the-elephant-in-the-room/>.
14. Cueva, Juan P., MD. "EMR Cloning: A Bad Habit." Chicago Medical Society, News. 2014. April 2015. <http://www.cmsdocs.org/news/emr-cloning-a-bad-habit>.
15. Tews, Ronda, CPC, CHC, CCS-P. "Set Up Templates So Cloning Is Not Questioned." AAPC Healthcare Business Monthly Archive. June 2014. April 2015. < http://news.aapc.com/set-up-templates-so-cloning-is-not-questioned/>.
16. Will, Joyce, RHIT, CPC. "Win the Battle of the Clones." AAPC Healthcare Business Monthly Archive. November 2013. April 2015. <http://news.aapc.com/win-the-battle-of-the-clones/>.
17. "HHS and DOJ Issue Joint Letter on Cloning of Medical Records." SCAN Health Plan. October 2012. April 2015. < http://hccublog.scanhealthplan.com/2012/10/hhs-and-doj-issue-joint-letter-on.html>.
18. HHS & DOJ. "Joint Letter on EHR Fraud Concerns." September 2012. April 2015. http://www.hccuniversity.com/documents/hcc/tools/HHS%20DOJ%20Letter%20on%20Cloning.pdf .
19. "Medical Record Cloning." Palmetto GBA, Medicare Jurisdiction 11 Part B. October 2014. April 2015. < http://www.palmettogba.com/palmetto/providers.nsf/DocsCat/Jurisdiction-11-Part-B~8MKQK88358>.
20. FCSO Medicare. "Documentation." The Florida Medicare B Update, third quarter 2006 (vol. 4, no. 3), pg. 3.
21. Prasad, Alok. "5 Ways to Prevent Fraud When Using an EHR." MedCityNews.com. February 2015. April 2015. http://medcitynews.com/2015/02/5-ways-to-prevent-ehr-fraud/.
22. McKimmy, Roger, MD, Oregon Medical Board Vice Chair. "The Pitfalls of Electronic Medical Records." Oregon Medical Board Report. Vol. 124, No. 4, Fall 2012: pp. 1, 8-9. http://www.oregon.gov/omb/Newsletter/Fall%202012.pdf.
23. CMS. Medicare Program; Negotiated Rulemaking: Coverage and Administrative Policies for Clinical Diagnostic Laboratory Services; Final Rule (42 CFR Part 410). Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 226. https://www.cms.gov/medicare/coverage/coveragegeninfo/downloads/lab1.pdf .
24. CMS. "Definitions, Order." Medicare Benefit Policy Manual (Pub. 100-2). Chapter 15 – Covered Medical and Other Health Services, § 80.6.1.
25. Noridian Medicare. "Signature Requirement Questions and Answers." Updated February 2015. Last accessed January 7, 2016. https://med.noridianmedicare.com/web/jfb/cert-reviews/signature-requirement-q-a .
26. Noridian Medicare. "Signature Requirements." Last accessed May 18, 2017. < https://med.noridianmedicare.com/web/jeb/cert-reviews/signature-requirements> .
27. CMS. "Signature Attestation Statement." Medicare Program Integrity Manual. Publication 100-08, chapter 3, § 3.3.2.4.C.
28. Noridian Medicare. "Proof of Delivery." Last accessed September 27, 2017. https://med.noridianmedicare.com/web/jddme/topics/documentation/proof-of-delivery .
29. Noridian Medicare. "Avoiding CERT denials for Proof of Delivery." Last accessed 8/22/2017. https://med.noridianmedicare.com/web/jddme/avoiding-cert-denials-for-proof-of-delivery.
30. Noridian Medicare. "Proof of Delivery - Requirements for Signature and Date." Last accessed 8/22/2017. https://med.noridianmedicare.com/web/jddme/policies/dmd-articles/proof-of-delivery-requirements-for-signature-and-date.

Attachment

Cloning of Medical Notes: 
Documentation is considered cloned when each entry in the medical record for a beneficiary is worded exactly like or similar to the previous entries. Cloning also occurs when medical documentation is exactly the same from beneficiary to beneficiary. It would not be expected that every patient had the exact same problem, symptoms, and required the exact same treatment.

Cloned documentation does not meet medical necessity requirements for coverage of services rendered due to the lack of specific, individual information. All documentation in the medical record must be specific to the patient and her/his situation at the time of the encounter. Cloning of documentation is considered a misrepresentation of the medical necessity requirement for coverage of services. Identification of this type of documentation will lead to denial of services for lack of medical necessity and recoupment of all overpayments made.

This is from another source (attached):

Cloned documentation is considered a misrepresentation of the events and services in that entry and a falsification of the medical record (FCSO Medicare 12); the accuracy and validity of the entire entry is damaged. Other entries in the record may also become suspect. (OMB 22)  

Medical records documentation is considered cloned when:

• Multiple entries in a patient chart are identical or similar to other entries in the same chart.
• Entries in the medical record are identical or similar from patient to patient to patient, without expected unique variations. It would not be expected that every patient had the exact same problem, symptoms, and required the exact same treatment.
• Information from previous entries of the same provider or other providers is pulled forward into the current entry, particularly when it is not updated or not relevant to the current encounter.
• In other words, copying and pasting, pulling forward information, and the use of macros or templates could all be considered cloning.  

Over-documentation is the practice of inserting false or irrelevant documentation to create the appearance of support for billing higher level services. (OIG 11) Vast amounts of clinical data and whole text from previous notes or the initial history and physical do not add value or clarity to the medical record; the story of the patient and the services becomes muddled and obscured under a deluge of clinical information that may not even be relevant or current.  

Although the problem has certainly become more prevalent with the advent and increased use of electronic medical records systems (EHR/EMR), cloning of medical records can occur in all types of medical record formats (handwritten, dictated, typed, and electronic).

Amended Records

Medical Review Payment Decisions
Incomplete or illegible records can result in denial of payment for services billed to Medicare. Claim payment decisions that result from a medical review of your records are not a reflection on your competence as a health care professional or the quality of care you provide to your patients. Specifically, the results are based on review of the documentation that Medicare received.

For a claim for Medicare benefits to be valid, there must be sufficient documentation in the provider's or hospital's records to verify the services were performed, were "reasonable and necessary" and required the level of care that was delivered.

Please understand that Medicare is aware that some patients do require professional services at greater frequency and duration than others, including more extensive diagnostic procedures. When this is the case, documentation substantiating the medical necessity for such treatment must be in the medical record. Then, documentation of all services rendered is absolutely necessary in order for a claim to be properly evaluated.

If there is no documentation, then there is no justification for the services or level of care billed. Additionally, if there is insufficient documentation on the claims that have already been adjudicated by Medicare, reimbursement may be considered an overpayment and the funds can be partially or fully recovered.

Elements of a Complete Medical Record

When records are requested, it is important that you send all associated documentation that supports the services billed within the time frame designated in the written request. Elements of a complete medical record may include:

• Physician orders, and/or certification of medical necessity.
• Patient questionnaires associated with physician services.
• Progress notes of another provider that are referenced in your own notes.
• Treatment logs.
• Related professional consultation reports.
• Procedure, lab, X-ray and diagnostic reports.

Amended Medical Records

Late entries, addendums or correction to a medical record are legitimate occurrences in documentation of clinical services. A late entry, an addendum or a correction to the medical record bears the current date of that entry and is signed by the person making the addition or change.

A late entry supplies additional information that was omitted from the original entry. The late entry bears the current date, is added as soon as possible and is written only if the person documenting has total recall of the omitted information.

Example: A late entry following treatment of multiple trauma might add "the left foot was noted to be abraded laterally."

An addendum is used to provide information that was not available at the time of the original entry. The addendum should also be timely and bear the current date and reason for the addition or clarification of information being added to the medical record.

Example: An addendum could note "The chest X-ray report was reviewed and showed an enlarged cardiac silhouette."

When making a correction to the medical record, never write over or otherwise obliterate the passage when an entry to a medical record is made in error. Draw a single line through the erroneous information, keeping the original entry legible. Sign and date the deletion, stating the reason for correction above or in the margin. Document the correct information on the next line or space, with the current date and time, making reference back to the original entry.

Correction of electronic records should follow the same principles of tracking both the original entry and the correction with the current date, time and reason for the change. When a hard copy is generated from an electronic record, both records must be corrected. Any corrected record submitted must make clear the specific change made, the date of the change and the identity of the person making that entry.

Falsified Documentation

Providers are reminded that deliberate falsification of medical records is a felony offense and is viewed seriously when encountered. Example of falsifying records include:

• Creation of new records when records are requested.
• Back-dating entries.
• Post-dating entries.
• Pre-dating entries.
• Writing over.
• Adding to existing documentation (except as described in late entries, addendums and corrections).

Corrections to the medical record legally amended prior to claims submission and/or medical review will be considered in determining the validity of services billed. If these changes appear in the record following payment determination based on medical review, only the original record will be reviewed in determining payment of services billed to Medicare.

Appeal of claims denied on the basis of an incomplete record may result in a reversal of the original denial if the information supplied includes pages or components that were part of the original medical record, but were not submitted on the initial review.

Sources: Medicare B News, Issue 196, dated April 15 2002: "Documentation Guidelines for Medicare Services"

               ξ1833(e) Title XVIII of the Social Security Act (No Documentation)

               ξ1842(a)(1)(c) of the Social Sercurity Act (Carrier Audits)

               ξ1862(a)(1)(A) of Title XVIII of the Social Security Act (Medical Necessity)

               Schott, Sharon. "How Poor Documentation Does Damage in the Court Room." Journal of AHIMA 74, no. 4 (April 2003): 20-24.

               Dougherty, Michelle. "Maintaining a Legally Sound Health Record." Journal of AHIMA 73, no. 8 (April 2003): 64A-G.

This medical policy was developed through consideration of peer-reviewed medical literature generally recognized by the relevant medical community, U.S. FDA approval status, nationally accepted standards of medical practice and accepted standards of medical practice in this community, Blue Cross Blue Shield Association technology assessment program (TEC) and other nonaffiliated technology evaluation centers, reference to federal regulations, other plan medical policies, and accredited national guidelines.

"Current Procedural Terminology © American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved" 

History From 2018 Forward